One of the academic stereotypes often bandied around is that we only have eyes for our own research – teaching is an irritating and burdensome responsibility. While there may be some out there with that attitude, my experience so far is that many academics enjoy many aspects of teaching. They find motivation and reward, even delight, in the various interactions they have with students and the intellectual development that they witness. Prioritising teaching over research can be a function of the great pressure on time during term, but can also arise from a deep-seated sense of the value of teaching, the privileged position you have as a tutor.
We should read sceptically the claims about the almost osmotic transfer of excellent research into excellent teaching. All too often, such claims have political audiences in mind; they are conditioned by designs for territorial defence – both in ideological and in financial terms – on the part of the ‘elite’ universities and their representatives and advocates. That’s not, however, to say that there’s no relationship between what we do in the archives (or the lab) and what we do in the classroom.
Revisiting my notes on the nineteenth-century Jewish periodical I studied for my Master’s research over a decade ago has been a bit of a revelation. I have found delight in rediscovering the material and thinking about what I could do with it now (a couple of articles on Jewish citizenship and Romantically-influenced concepts of the role of religion in the state are taking shape). Developing a proposal with a colleague for a project on the architecture and public history of parliament buildings has been energising and exciting.
If that delight in, that energy for doing history ‘shows up’ when you teach, irresistably bubbling up to the surface, surely that’s a valuable connection for students? So, as we teach, we’re also modelling being historians of different kinds, and encouraging our students to join in the ongoing conversation about the past, its interpretations and meanings. I hope that my own sense of engagement with being a historian ‘shows up’ and that I can help my students find similar excitement in aspects of their studies. Whatever course each student’s life ends up taking, knowing what intellectual excitement feels like, being able to look for it and recognise it when you find it, is surely an asset.
Being a researcher doesn’t automatically make you a better teacher. There are teachers who communicate delight and enthusiasm for their subject without being actively engaged in research. Where academics are doing both, we should offer more nuanced understandings of the connections and flows between research and teaching – in both directions.