Skip to content

thehistoricalimperative

History, policy, higher education and public life

  • Home
  • About/contact me
  • Presented papers
  • Publications
  • Teaching

Month: July 2013

The stories we tell: (national) archives and myth-making

16/07/201316/07/2013 ~ alixrgreen ~ 2 Comments

National ArchivesThe focal point of the National Archives Experience – and the reason (most) people stood in long lines to be there in the first place – is the rotunda in which the three ‘Charters of Freedom’ are displayed: the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.   You start with a film.  Such films (the one at the Capitol is similar) serve as orientation. They frame the expectations for how visitors will/should engage with the exhibitions that follow.

The need to extoll the virtues of national pride and those of record preservation made for an uneasy mix in the National Archives.  The film led with the former.  So we get the pitch about being defined as a people by a shared history, smoothing over divisions still being played out today.

Just when the claims being made for history were becoming a little too much to take (no historians were interviewed/harmed in the making of this commercial…), the film switches tone.  We then get brief insights into the potential roles for records in public life: holding political representatives to account, for example being one that seems to reflect the distinctive characteristics of the US system.

These roles are explored further in the (queue-free) permanent exhibit of the Public Vaults.  The exhibit is structured into themes using from words in the Preamble to the Constitution:

  • We the People – records of family and citizenship
  • To Form a More Perfect Union – records of liberty and law
  • Provide for the Common Defense – records of war and diplomacy
  • Promote the General Welfare – records of frontiers and firsts
  • To Ourselves and Our Posterity – keeping records for future

In a sense, this approach invites us to extend our thinking.  So, rather than venerate a document in and of itself, we are asked to consider its ‘life’: the meanings, implications and applications of its constituent ideas, and how these may change over time.  As Jill Lepore has pointed out in her book on the Tea Party, this ‘life in history’ is particularly problematic in the US:

‘…because of the nature of the Constitution, the founding bears a particular burden: it is a story about what binds Americans together – We the people, do ordain – but it also serves as the final source of political authority, the ultimate arbiter of every argument, the last court of appeal.  No history can easily or always bear that weight.’ (p. 47)

So the Archives exhibit seems to me to be attempting something rather  important.  It’s making the connection between foundational documents – which readily capture the imagination and attention, and can easily be taken ‘out of time’ to serve (divergent) ideological purposes – with their historical ‘lives’, and both with the roles of history in public more broadly.

Having said all that, I did find myself being drawn in by the pitch for a historically-rooted national identity.  My American ‘half’ is a growing interest after many years of relative indifference.  And I can feel how compelling the narratives of foundation and national identity are.  It’s rather too easy just to dismiss the latter, to point out the abuses and elisions of history as if no further argument were necessary.  But that would surely be just as ahistorical as seeing the Charters of Freedom as timeless, definitive authorities.

Perhaps we need to think seriously about why ideas of nationhood and national identity remain resonant in a time when national borders seem less stable or relevant.  Perhaps there is a role for stories and myth-making, and for these to be accommodated alongside, and in dialogue with, more critical and sceptical approaches to the past.  Perhaps national archives are the institutions at which this, highly challenging, historical task can begin.

Advertisements

About this blog

This is a blog about the interfaces and intersections between history, policy, education and public life (and any others I come across).

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

  • September 2017
  • February 2017
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012

Twitter

  • RT @PeterMandler1: Helpful thread. @RoyalHistSoc successfully lobbied for historical exemptions in DP Act now being disregarded. https://t.… 4 days ago
  • RT @MariaSienk: #Archive30 - after much debate, I’ve decided to highlight our collection of Annual Reports. Fairly standard business record… 4 days ago
  • RT @MrTimDunn: There goes my evening. The "Britain From Above" archive is now FREE in high resolution and it is *incredible*. 96,000 photos… 1 week ago
  • RT @HaywardCL: This is a gorgeous thread twitter.com/gawanmac/statu… 1 week ago
  • RT @PatricKielty: Some men seem to have forgotten this woman's name. How about the rest of us shout it from the rooftops? THANK YOU MO MOWL… 1 week ago
Follow @alix_green

Creative Commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Advertisements
Blog at WordPress.com.
Cancel